“Which of these three, do you think, proved neighbour to the man who fell among the robbers? … The one who showed mercy to him. And Jesus said to him, ‘Go and do likewise’” (Luke 10: 36, 37)


On this 15th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Cycle C, the Church invites us to reflect on one of the most popular parables of Jesus – The Parable of the Good Samaritan. This is another of the parables of Jesus exclusive to the Gospel of Luke. The parable extols the virtues of the Samaritan over the indifference of the Jewish Priest and Levite. Many scholars attribute Luke’s preference of the gentiles to the Jews in his narratives to the fact that he addressed his writings, the Gospel and Acts of the Apostles, to Theophilus (Luke 1: 3; Acts 1: 1), who was, most likely, a Roman Official, who might have sponsored the writing and publication of the works of Luke for circulation among the Gentile Christians. Writing with the pen of Luke and the ink of a gentile, Theophilus, had to make the message pleasant to his immediate audience. Be this as it may, the message and the challenge of the parable before us today is unequivocal and very much needed for our time and for our society that has been robbed of its humaneness because of insipid approach to one another.

Why the Parable? There is a saying that “There is no text without a context.” In order to understand a “Text” properly, it is important to understand the “Context.” It was after the disciples had returned from their missionary experience, and while Jesus was still with His disciples and the crowd that “a lawyer” who was an expert and an interpreter of the Mosaic Law, stood up from among the crowd to ask Jesus: “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” His intention for the action is clearly stated by Luke, “to test” or “to disconcert” Jesus or put more pointedly, “to embarrass” Jesus. Being an expert of the Law of Moses, and having listened to all that Jesus had to say to the crowds, which were in contrast to what he and the other teachers of the Law were teaching; and seeing that the people were beginning to hold Jesus in a much higher esteem, a steam of jealousy must have been rising from within him; and since his pride would not let him, he decided to show off. Therefore, in an effort to demonstrate to the people that “this commoner, this son of a carpenter, this illiterate from Nazareth knew nothing and was not worth their attention, he decided to throw this question at Jesus.

Notice here how a good deed could become unrighteous because of a bad intention. The questions of the lawyer concerning eternal life and neighbour were very relevant because considering the gamut of laws and prescriptions in the Jewish religion coupled with the seeming ambiguity on the identity of neighbour in Leviticus 19: 18, there was need for clarification. But the intention of the lawyer, arising from personal pride and ill-desire to test, disconcert, confuse and embarrass Jesus, was evil. Therefore, the whole deed was not right. How often have we fallen into the same error? How many times have we allowed our pride to rule and destroy our good deeds?

In His wisdom, Jesus turned the question back at him saying: “What is written in the law? What do you read there?” Jesus was saying in effect: “Yes, you are an expert in the law. You should know the law better. Tell us what the law says. Tell us how you understand it.” And he answered: “You shall love the Lord your God with all you heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength and with all your mind; and your neighbour as yourself.” His answer was a combination of the provisions of the law as stated in two different portions of the Torah – Deuteronomy 6: 5 and Leviticus 19: 18.  Then Jesus said to him: “You have answered right. Do these and you will live.”

“And who is my neighbour?” St. Luke tells us that to justify himself, the lawyer asked Jesus further: “And who is my neighbour?” In Leviticus 19: 18, there is a seeming equivocation as to the identity of a neighbour with the introduction of the expression “one of your people.” Hence, there was a need to ask for clarification from one who would know better. Jesus, in His characteristic way, told this timeless parable and then asked the lawyer to sift out the answer. In this parable there are four main characters: the traveller, the priest, the Levite and the Samaritan.

  • The Traveller: The road between Jerusalem and Jericho was a distance of little-less-than twenty miles. It was therefore a long rocky road with swift turns slopping down at about 3, 600 feet. It was certainly a notorious and dangerous road to travel alone. In that case, this traveller was careless to have embarked alone with is treasures. No doubts, “he fell among robbers” who stripped him of his treasures, beat him severely and left him half dead.
  • The Priest: He came by, saw the forlorn beaten man, not sure if he is alive or dead “passed by the other side.” The Law of Moses (Numbers 19: 11) states that he would be ritually unclean for seven days if he should touch a dead man. To be cleansed involved expensive details. The priest must have remembered this prohibition and decided to obey the ceremonial laws rather than profane himself by rescuing the man.
  • The Levite: Among the Jews, all priests are Levites, but not all Levites are priests. So this man was of the tribe of Levi but not of the house of Aaron. However, more humane feeling and response was expected of him in this case. But he too, came, saw and “passed by the other side.”
  • The Samaritan: The third person to pass on the way was a Samaritan. He came, saw and “had compassion” on the man who fell among the robbers. He went to the man, bandaged his wounds, pouring oil and wine; set him on  his don key and took him to an inn, gave them two denarii for their expenses and promise to pay more for whatever else they would have spent more.

Then Jesus asked the lawyer, “Which of these three, do you think, proved neighbour to the man who fell among robbers?” To this the lawyer answered: “The one who showed mercy on him.” Notice, the lawyer did not say “The Samaritan” because the Jews were enemies of the Samaritan, who they considered second-class by all standards. They were a mixed race of Assyrians and Jews brought about by the Assyrian invasion and captivity of the northern region. Today, our world is still struggling with racism, hatred, intolerance and prejudices that have blurred our vision and view of common humanity.

It is striking how different people respond to the same situation. It is not so much what we see with our eyes that matters, but how we interpret it from the treasures of our heart. For the priest and the Levite, the law, which is made to serve man (Mark 2: 27), became the reason not to render service to man. They were slaves to what is called “deification of law” – the law became their God. Many have failed to render humanitarian service and to offer simple acts of charity because they have made law the centre of all things in their lives. When law becomes an excuse for not doing good and we hide under the disguise of law to omit the good things we should have done, we are no better than the Priest and the Levite in our story. As Christians we know that any law that confronts and contradict the provisions of the gospel of Christ are not just laws. And we also know that any laws that have not exceptions, which make it serve man better does not have the right intentions.

The Samaritan here is always qualified with the adjective “Good” because of his compassionate response to the unknown unfortunate traveller. This is exactly what Jesus expects of us and actually commands us all to do when He said to the lawyer: “Go and do likewise.”  We are neighbours because we are human beings created in the image and likeness of God and not because we share close proximities, blood, language, race, religion and nation. The love we show to the people close to us is the same love we are expected to show to those who are far off. Love is in human nature because we were created in the and likeness of God, Who is love.

Let me conclude with these insights from the treasury of our fathers in the faith. St. Augustine offers this allegorical interpretation of the parable: “The whole human race, you see, is that man who is lying on the road, left there by bandits half dead, who was ignored by the passing priest and Levite, while the passing Samaritan stopped by him to take care of him … In this Samaritan the Lord Jesus Christ wanted us to see Himself.” We can also see ourselves in the man robbed: we have been robbed of our purity by the sin of our first parents, left unsaved by the law, but Christ came and took us up in our impurity, carried us into the Church, where we are washed with the waters of baptism, anointed with oil of the Sacraments and restored by His Death and Resurrection. This New Life is His gift to us all. Therefore, let us go and do like the Samaritan.

is disciples and teaching